Who are the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council?

Discussions have taken place over the suitability of the veto power in the UN Security Council. Key arguments include that the selection of permanent members no longer represent the most stable and responsible member states in the United Nations and that the veto power slows down important political decisions. Due to the changes that have taken place politically and economically on a global scale since the forming of the UN Security Council in 1945, widespread debate has been apparent over whether the current permanent members of the UN Security Council are the best member states to hold veto power. While all permanent members are still regarded as great powers, there is debate over their suitability to retain veto power. Another argument against retaining the veto power is that it is detrimental to fast, balanced political decisions. The Rwandan Genocide serves as an example of when the veto power proved detrimental to the genesis of a global relief effort that could have reduced the severity of the genocide. Debate also exists over the use of the veto power as a political aid to a permanent member's allies. The United States of America have used their veto power more than any other permanent member since 1972, particularly in resolutions condemning Israel. This has spread concerns that the veto power serves as a medium for permanent members to benefit their allies with the power of the UN Security Council.